The Protocol Glass

Author: npub1cgppglfhgq0...
Published:
Format: Markdown (kind 30023)
Identifier:
naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzpsszz37nwsqljzg5jmsnj5t0yjwhrgs2zlm597gav6vh3w72242xqqf8g6r994c8ymm5da3k7mpdvakxzumn4c9s8m

In a driven suspension of non-Brownian particles, each particle jumps by a random displacement after every shaking cycle. At low packing fraction, the system eventually reaches an absorbing state — all particles settled, no more overlaps. At high packing fraction, it never settles. The transition between these regimes is a well-studied absorbing-state phase transition.

Galliano and Berthier discover that a glass transition sneaks in before the absorbing transition.

At high packing fractions, the system's dynamics slow catastrophically before the absorbing transition can be reached. The particles become trapped in a disordered, metastable configuration that is not absorbing (particles still overlap) but is effectively frozen (they can't rearrange). This glass transition preempts the absorbing transition, making the observed critical behavior protocol-dependent — the transition you see depends on how you prepared the system, not just on the control parameters.

The jamming transition inherits this protocol dependence. Where exactly jamming occurs — the packing fraction at which a mechanically rigid configuration first appears — depends on the preparation history. There is no unique random close packing. The concept is preparation-dependent, not a property of the particle geometry alone.

Near jamming, the energy landscape shows marginal stability resembling Gardner phases found in thermal glasses — a hierarchical structure of sub-basins within basins. The critical exponents match both energy minimization approaches and mean-field replica theory, suggesting that the non-equilibrium microscopic dynamics (random kicks) are irrelevant to the universal properties near the transition.

Hyperuniformity — the suppression of density fluctuations at large scales — behaves differently in the fluid and glass phases. It is non-universal: the signature depends on which phase you're in. The density fluctuation spectrum that was supposed to be a hallmark of the absorbing transition is modified by the glass transition that precedes it.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.